California governor wants reserves and cuts to fix nearly $38B deficit, mostly sparing schools
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced $291 billion state spending plan Wednesday with an estimated $37.9 billion deficit.
That’s a significantly smaller budget hole than the Legislative Analyst’s Office predicted in December. It estimated the state would face a $68 billion deficit.
That difference is likely due partly to a rebounding stock market. But Newsom says his finance officials also have revenue and spending disagreements than the legislative advisers.
“We just are a little less pessimistic than they are about the next year,” he said.
Newsom outlined how he wants to spend taxpayer dollars and other state money for the fiscal year starting July 1. He’ll spend the next six months hashing out a final plan with the Legislature, also controlled by Democrats.
The governor is proposing to draw $13 billion from the state’s reserves to cover some of the deficit. He’s also proposing $8.5 billion in spending cuts. Nearly $3 billion of that would come from climate programs and another $1.2 billion from housing programs.
Unlike the federal government, California law says the state must pass a balanced budget — meaning it can’t spend more money than it has. Newsom and lawmakers were able to avoid major spending cuts last year through a combination of making smaller cuts, borrowing and pushing some expenses to future years.
Decisions about how to handle the deficit could be particularly fraught given this year’s election, when many lawmakers will ask voters to keep them in Sacramento. Every decision Newsom makes, meanwhile, will be viewed through the lens of his future political ambitions. The Democratic governor’s term goes through 2026, and he could run for president in 2028.
Some school superintendents had feared cuts, as education makes up the largest share of state spending. But public schools and the 5.8 million students they serve appeared to avoid severe reductions, with Newsom proposing to withdraw $5.7 billion from the state’s special savings account for public education to help make up the shortfall.
A voter-approved law requires the state to spend about 40% of its budget on public education in most years. During the Great Recession, public schools weathered deep cuts, leading to layoffs and school closures that many districts are still recovering from.
Some school superintendents had feared cuts, as education makes up the largest share of state spending. But public schools and the 5.8 million students they serve appeared to avoid severe reductions, with Newsom proposing to withdraw $5.7 billion from the state’s special savings account for public education to help make up the shortfall.
A voter-approved law requires the state to spend about 40% of its budget on public education in most years. During the Great Recession, public schools weathered deep cuts, leading to layoffs and school closures that many districts are still recovering from.
In housing, Newsom proposed cutting $1.2 billion, including $300 million in regional planning grants, $250 million to build and preserve multi-family housing and another $250 million from a program that helps residents and nonprofits buy and rehab properties at risk of foreclosure.
Newsom also wants to delay $260 million for cities and counties to prevent and end homelessness, pushing the spending from this budget year to 2025-26. His proposal also cuts $100 million to administer the homelessness prevention grant program and delays more than $300 million intended to beef up mental health infrastructure and assist homeless families and vulnerable adults.
On climate change, Newsom proposed to cut spending by $23.5 million for a pilot program to deploy zero-emission trucks and by $7.3 million for a program to give grants to zero-emission vehicle manufacturers. He also plans to delay $600 million in spending to 2027-28 instead of 2024-25 for programs that help car owners replace their gas-powered vehicles with hybrid and zero-emission vehicles.
In health care, last year Newsom signed legislation to gradually boost workers’ pay to $25 an hour, with increases set to start June 1. He’s now asking lawmakers to add a so-called trigger requirement to say the increases are subject to how much state money is available. That’s likely to draw protest from labor unions that fought for the wage increase.
State Sen. Roger Niello, a Republican representing Fair Oaks and vice-chair of the Senate budget committee, is concerned about the amount of spending Newsom is proposing to delay, as opposed to looking for more places to make cuts.
“A real risk of not developing a sustainable spending plan is that the budget makes commitments that maybe it can’t follow up on if we do have severe continued deficits,” he said.
The budget numbers will shift again by the time Newsom announces a revised plan in May — after Californians have filed their tax returns and state officials have a better idea of how much money they have.
“We know we’re going to have to make difficult choices,” Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat from Los Angeles and chair of the Assembly Budget Committee, said before Newsom’s announcement. “We just don’t know how difficult they’re going to be yet.”
